In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- TISFD takes on (systemic) challenge
- EU to score data centres on energy and water use
- Revised ESRS published in EU Official Journal
- India adopts ISSA 5000
- Nature disclosure adoption hits four figures
- ASIC lays out eight action items for corporate climate reporting
- Building a panoramic sustainability reporting framework for the public sector
- Accountancy Europe explores benefits and risks of using GenAI in assurance
- NGFS issues 2026 supervisory guide on climate and nature risks
- Harvard tracks corporate climate commitments
Latest Stories
-
Irish supervisory body flags 2026 corporate reporting considerations
25 September 2026 -
IASB finalises equity method project
25 September 2026 -
KPMG: GHG accounting guide for Ghanaian firms
25 September 2026 -
Harvard tracks corporate climate commitments
24 September 2026 -
WBCSD helps companies assess capabilities for integrating physical risks
24 September 2026
