In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- The financial case for community engagements
- Is the European Commission creating a two-tier sustainability reporting framework?
- IPSASB advances on public policy climate disclosures
- CSRD compliance driving better workforce reporting, NN Group report finds
- Canada funds ISSB but won't adopt its standards (yet)
- Sustainability values missing from the balance sheet
- Geetika Arora appointed to IASB Global Preparers Forum
- UK FRC consults on revised external expert requirements in audit standards
- GRI's global baseline
- EBA cuts back Pillar 3 ESG reporting rules
Latest Stories
-
California defers climate reporting deadline to November
26 June 2026 -
ICAEW to support standards adoption through strategic partnerships
26 June 2026 -
UK FRC simplifies auditor disclosure requirements
26 June 2026 -
Paris court orders TotalEnergies to address Scope 3 risks
26 June 2026Oil company must revise plan for identifying and mitigating negative impacts linked to indirect GHG emissions, under French Duty of Vigilance Law
-
World on track for 3.2°C warming under current corporate targets, CDP and WWF find
25 June 2026