In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- IOE issues practical guide to human rights due diligence
- Corporate Disclosures 2025 round-up
- Corporate Disclosures 2025: Robin Hodess outlines GRI's role in a shifting global landscape
- Corporate Disclosures 2025: Meet the Standard Setters
- UK FCA proposes transparency rules for ESG ratings providers
- Corporate Disclosures 2025: Richard Barker on the present and future of the ISSB
- IASB finalises illustrative examples of reporting uncertainties in financial statements
- ESRS simplifications approved by EFRAG board
- Corporate Disclosures 2025: Investors make the case for sustainability data
- Simplified ESRS submitted to European Commission
Latest Stories
-
Corporate Disclosures 2025: Laying the foundations for sustainability assurance
05 December 2025A company and an audit firm highlight the importance of establishing robust governance and controls over the sustainability reporting process before obtaining assurance
-
EFRAG launches 'ESRS Knowledge Hub'
04 December 2025 -
Costco commits to reducing deforestation risks in avocado supply chain
04 December 2025 -
NAO highlights best practice in UK public sector climate disclosures
04 December 2025 -
IASB proposes new accounting model for interest rate risk
04 December 2025
