In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- Civil society groups urge EU to maintain ambition in revised ESRS
- Financial services firms plan to deploy AI for sustainability reporting, EY finds
- Japan updates Scope 3 reporting requirements
- Seven in ten companies see value in sustainability reporting, PwC finds
- UK FRC updates guidance on 'comply or explain' governance reporting
- UK government adopts sustainability reporting standards
- Understanding California's emissions disclosure regime
- IFRS Foundation appoints members to Sustainability Standards Advisory Forum
- OECD issues guidance on AI due diligence
- Interactive versions of simplified ESRS available on EFRAG's knowledge hub
Latest Stories
-
Seven in ten companies see value in sustainability reporting, PwC finds
17 March 2026 -
ICAS: Accountants highlight concerns over generative AI
17 March 2026 -
Norton Rose Fulbright answers FAQs on CSDDD revisions
17 March 2026 -
IPSASB commences second phase of climate reporting project
17 March 2026
-
UK FRC updates guidance on 'comply or explain' governance reporting
16 March 2026