In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- OECD launches corporate due diligence 'checkers'
- The Scope 2 revolt at the GHG Protocol
- CDP announces 2025 'A-list'
- Should investors be told of AI-written annual reports?
- Climate reporting with Chinese characteristics
- UK Sustainability Reporting Standards set to be issued in February
- Climate reporting laws stand trial in California
- Is AI worth melting for or will it leave leaders on ice?
- S&P Global highlights 10 key sustainability considerations for 2026
- Accountancy Europe: Changes to national audit exemption thresholds
Latest Stories
-
UK FCA consults on ISSB-aligned reporting rules
30 January 2026 -
GHG Protocol releases land sector and removals standard
30 January 2026 -
Accountancy Europe details changes to CSRD and CSDDD
30 January 2026 -
ISSB takes first steps on nature
30 January 2026Board discusses scope and objectives of standard-setting project
-
IPSASB issues inaugural public sector climate standard
29 January 2026