In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- The not so beautiful game: FIFA controversy triggers calls for reform and transparency
- Australia's regulatory reassurances
- Linklaters publishes CSDDD implementation timeline
- IFRS Foundation turns to central bankers for Trustees and IASB Chair roles
- Japanese government partners with CDP on corporate nature data
- Grant Thornton summarises revised EU reporting framework
- WEF makes case for avoided emissions
- Australian securities regulator reflects on first mandatory climate disclosure cycle
- ICAEW offers recommendations for audit report presentation
- Mandatory ESG disclosure reduces stock price crash risk, study finds
Latest Stories
-
Lawyers pulled into the corporate sustainability sphere as regulation bites
12 August 2026Sustainability and legal functions increasingly collaborating, with disclosure and due diligence requirements cited as the biggest drivers
-
ICAEW offers recommendations for audit report presentation
11 August 2026 -
Grant Thornton summarises revised EU reporting framework
11 August 2026 -
WBA: Most companies falling short on proposed integrated transition indicators
11 August 2026 -
IFRS Foundation turns to central bankers for Trustees and IASB Chair roles
11 August 2026Steven Maijoor and Sam Woods to take up the roles in the coming months