In making revisions to the SFDR, the European Commission must not simply loosen definitions which have been seen to be ineffective, but must ensure that far greater transparency is required from investors in the future, according to a research from Responsible Companies, Frank Bold.
Most Read
- US SEC chair Atkins "shocked" by audit firms' climate stance
- ChemSec: Most EU chemical companies not reporting on substances of concern
- Council of the EU and European Parliament strike Omnibus I deal
- Microsoft shareholders maintain support for human rights reporting
- Fewer Canadian companies issuing sustainability reports, Torys finds
- KPMG summarises ESRS simplifications
- Corporate Disclosures 2025: Robin Hodess outlines GRI's role in a shifting global landscape
- IPSASB delivers first public sector climate standard
- Will ESRS sector guidance survive EU omnibus trilogue?
- GRI consults on revised labour standards
Latest Stories
-
ISSB to draft nature disclosure standard
12 December 2025 -
Edo Kienhuis appointed IAASB vice-chair
12 December 2025 -
IIGC sets out investors' expectations on integrated climate disclosures
12 December 2025 -
IPSASB delivers first public sector climate standard
12 December 2025Board approves climate-related disclosure standard for public sector bodies' operations, with a public policy climate standard set to be approved in December 2025
-
Fewer Canadian companies issuing sustainability reports, Torys finds
11 December 2025