-
Float like a butterfly sting like the BEES: can the ISSB learn from the Rumble in the Jungle?
06 February 2024As EFRAG seeks alignment with the TNFD framework, is the ISSB down for the count in the global sustainability reporting arena?
-
Comment: True accounting and accountability for net-zero commitments began to arrive on 28th November 2023...
31 January 2024Andrew Watson, co-founder Rethinking Capital, discusses why IAS37 is the key to unlock climate accounting
-
2023 - A year of promise, will 2024 be the year of fulfilment?
29 December 2023Standards are out but question marks remain over jurisdictional adoption and companies' preparedness for reporting
-
Inside GRI's new energy and climate standards
11 December 2023Harold Pauwels, GRI director of standards, outlines the new disclosures that have been brought in and explains the reasons for the updates
-
Comment: Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven?
30 November 2023The material impact of caffein depravation
-
"Responsible investors won't be focusing on ISSB standards"
24 November 2023Rodney Ndamba, chief executive and founder of the Institute for Sustainability Africa, discusses the interrelation between reporting standards and economic development
-
ISSB adoption in Africa
21 November 2023Lebogang Senne, technical director of the Pan African Federation of Accountants (PAFA), discusses the considerations around adopting ISSB standards in Africa.
-
Tackling double materiality at Philip Morris International
13 November 2023Jennifer Motles, chief sustainability officer at Philip Morris International, discusses the company's double materiality assessment efforts.
-
Canada's next steps on ISSB implementation
03 October 2023Canadian Sustainability Standards Board chair (CSSB) Charles-Antoine St-Jean outlines the board's early progress and its plans to build capacity and adopt IFRS S1 and S2 in Canada
-
Opinion: California can be a blueprint for SEC on climate disclosures
18 September 2023Building corporate support, accumulating political endorsements and making compromises on Scope 3 worked in the golden state, could a similar strategy help the national regulator with its own climate disclosure rule?
